Thank you for your instruction.
The tests/test_input_shell10x_cantilever.py passed without error as I installed scikit-umfpack.
The tests/test_eigenvalue_solvers.py passed without error when atol=8.0e-2.
This test fails when atol=7.0e-2.
2016年5月6日金曜日 21時14分19秒 UTC+9 Robert Cimrman:
The tests/test_input_shell10x_cantilever.py failure is due to missing
scikit-umfpack - then the default scipy solver (superlu) is used, that has a
slightly lower precision (and is much slower). I will increase the expected
tolerance in the example so that this test passes also without umfpack.
Not sure about tests/test_eigenvalue_solvers.py - the printed results are
correct - probably also just a too strict tolerance issue - could you try
increasing atol on line 132 of the test file to see whether then the test passes?
On 05/06/2016 01:58 PM, pyontaku14 wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> I send the error report as attached.
> For test_input_linear_elastic_probes.py, I installed vtk and solved the
> 2016年5月4日水曜日 23時01分24秒 UTC+9 Robert Cimrman:
>> On 05/04/2016 03:42 PM, pyontaku14 wrote:
>>> Hi Robert,
>>> Thank you for your answer.
>>> I installed 2016.1.
>>> Though there are 3 failures in the test, I try this version.
>>> The failures are in eigenvalue_solvers, input_linear_elastic_probes
>>> and shell10x_cantilever.
>> Could you run the failed tests separately with --debug flag (see ), and
>> here the output? I suspect those failures are caused only by missing some
>> external solvers, but there might be some other problem.
>>  http://sfepy.org/doc-devel/installation.html#testing