On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:19:57 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:
On 07/03/2013 01:38 PM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 13:14:37 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:
>>
>> On 07/03/2013 01:51 AM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
>>> R,
>>>
>>> Attached is the Temperature distribution along the length with Peclet
>>> number graph which you wanted to have a look at.
>>> I used ParaView to generate it.
>>> It is validated by the Fig 6.2 of Computer Simulation of Flow and Heat
>>> Transfer, P S Ghoshdastidar, Tata McGraw-Hill.
>>
>> Good! Btw. are there some analytical relations that can be verified, for
>> example on some special simple geometries/boundary conditions? It would be
>> interesting to see the comparison of analytical/numerical curves in a
>> single
>> figure (I have no access to the book).
>>
>
> Yes this one can be verified with the analytical solution.
> I was about to ask you that the analytical vs simulation curve should be
> plotted for how many test cases?

As you wish (if it is ok :)) BTW. http://terri.toybox.ca/python-soc/ still does
not show your blog posts - is the subscription correct?


Yes R I saw it yesterday and I thought maybe it is not updated.
The subscription link points to http://ankitmahato.blogspot.in/search/label/Python
which is correct.
I think I should write to Terri

r.

>>
>> Similar figures could be also done in sfepy directly, check [1] - it is
>> mostly
>> useful when one tweaks and runs a simulation repeatedly, as the setup
>> needs
>> some effort...
>>
>
> Okie :)
>
>
>>
>> r.
>>
>> [1] http://sfepy.org/doc-devel/primer.html#probing
>>
>