Re: .mesh file documentation

23 Jun 2008


      Here is the output of runTests.py --debug tests/test_linear_solvers.py:
In [2]: run runTests.py --debug tests/test_linear_solvers.py
<<< tests/test_linear_solvers.py
sfe: warning: other missing: ['functions', 'modules',
'epbc_[0-9]+|epbcs', 'lcbc_[0-9]+|lcbcs', 'nbc_[0-9]+|nbcs']
sfe: warning: left over: ['outputName', 'TestCommon']
sfe: reading mesh...
sfe: ...done in 0.93 s
sfe: setting up domain edges...
sfe: ...done in 0.69 s
sfe: setting up domain faces...
sfe: ...done in 0.52 s
sfe: creating regions...
sfe:     leaf Gamma_Right region__0
sfe:     leaf Omega region__1
sfe:     leaf Gamma_Left region__2
sfe: ...done in 0.79 s
sfe: equation "Temperature":
sfe: dw_laplace.i1.Omega( coef.val, s, t ) = 0
sfe: describing geometries...
sfe: ...done in 0.05 s
sfe: setting up dof connectivities...
sfe: ...done in 0.00 s
sfe: using solvers:
nls: newton
ls: ls101
sfe: matrix shape: (9511, 9511)
sfe: assembling matrix graph...
sfe: ...done in 0.09 s
sfe: matrix structural nonzeros: 132239 (1.46e-03% fill)
sfe: updating materials...
sfe:     coef
sfe: ...done in 0.00 s
...
...
...
test instance prepared (1 test(s))
... dls100 ls.umfpack
... matrix size: (9511, 9511)
...         nnz: 132239
just before UMFPACK_CONTROL
just after UMFPACK_CONTROL
UMFPACK_CONTROL=20
sfe: nls: iter: 0, residual: 3.587850e+00 (rel: 1.000000e+00)
sfe:   rezidual:    0.02 [s]
sfe:      solve:    2.15 [s]
sfe:     matrix:    0.05 [s]
sfe: nls: iter: 1, residual: 4.177710e-15 (rel: 1.164405e-15)
...   rezidual:    0.02 [s]
...      solve:    2.15 [s]
...     matrix:    0.05 [s]
... condition: 0, err0: 3.588e+00, err: 4.178e-15
... ls101 ls.pyamg ruge_stuben_solver
... matrix size: (9511, 9511)
...         nnz: 132239
sfe: cannot import pyamg!
... solver failed:
... No module named pyamg
... ls102 ls.pyamg smoothed_aggregation_solver
... matrix size: (9511, 9511)
...         nnz: 132239
sfe: cannot import pyamg!
... solver failed:
... No module named pyamg
... ls110 ls.scipy_iterative cg
... matrix size: (9511, 9511)
...         nnz: 132239
... solver failed:
... No module named splinalg.isolva
... ls111 ls.scipy_iterative bicgstab
... matrix size: (9511, 9511)
...         nnz: 132239
... solver failed:
... No module named splinalg.isolva
... ls112 ls.scipy_iterative qmr
... matrix size: (9511, 9511)
...         nnz: 132239
... solver failed:
... No module named splinalg.isolva
... solution times:
... 2.15 : dls100 ls.umfpack
... 10000000000.00 : ls101 ls.pyamg ruge_stuben_solver
... 10000000000.00 : ls102 ls.pyamg smoothed_aggregation_solver
... 10000000000.00 : ls110 ls.scipy_iterative cg
... 10000000000.00 : ls111 ls.scipy_iterative bicgstab
... 10000000000.00 : ls112 ls.scipy_iterative qmr
--- test_solvers: failed!
!!! 1 test failed
1 test file executed in 3.14 s, 1 failure(s) of 1 test(s)
Ryan
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Robert Cimrman <cimr...@ntc.zcu.cz> wrote:
...
Ondrej Certik wrote:
...
On 6/21/08, Ryan Krauss <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
I ran into a little trouble with the hg version:
The call to solveStationaryOP passes in pb, conf, ...  while the
function definition expects problem, options, ...
Exactly.
...
...
Is this a bug?
Yes, it is definitely a bug. I am sure Robert will answer this one.
Yep. It was easy to fix, thanks for reporting it!
...
...
Here is the output of runTests.py:
In [5]: run runTests.py
<<< directory: tests, test files: 22
..
tests/test_lcbc_2d.py
+++   test_linearRigidBodyBC: ok
tests/test_lcbc_3d.py
+++   test_linearRigidBodyBC: ok
tests/test_linear_solvers.py
---   test_solvers: failed!
tests/test_meshio.py
...
+++   test_consistency_d_dw: ok
22 test file(s) executed in 34.30 s, 1 failure(s) of 27 test(s)
There is one failing test. Could you please send the output of
./runTests.py --debug
or './runTests.py --debug tests/test_linear_solvers.py'
to be more specific. I suspect you do not have some of the solvers
installed. If this is the case, I will have to fix the test...
r.
...