Hi Ankit,
thanks for the update. Nice movies!
Now we should think how to integrate this into the sfepy package - using Material for material parameters, Mesh/MeshIO for VTK output, Solver framework for the solver, numpy(-like) docstring standard for docstrings etc. Do you think you will get to some of those before the deadline? As for the finite volumes used - what are the main obstacles of converting that to finite elements?
Cheers, r.
On 09/12/2013 07:32 PM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
Hi R,
Sorry to keep you waiting. Here is the much awaited update - http://ankitmahato.blogspot.in/2013/09/python-software-foundation-sfepy-gsoc...
Regards, Ankit
On Friday, 6 September 2013 21:54:32 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:
On 09/06/2013 03:59 PM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
Hi R,
In the weak form: previous file. corrected now.) The H field is (=cT).
- The navier stokes equation will now have a source term.
- The energy equation will also have a source term (slight mistake in my
i need to calculate u,p,H (=cT), gl (liquid fraction) for each element. Iterating the energy equation to obtain convergence in the nodal liquid fraction value (source term) is one the key areas where I was having crisis situation.
So is it resolved?
If things get too complicated, try some simplifications so that we have some example(s) within SfePy for the GSoC final phase. I will be able to support you fully from 11.9.
The momentum and energy equations are coupled through both the buoyancy and the source term (Bu). The B depends on the liquid fraction which represents an extra unknown in the governing equations. Since the liquid fraction is updated such that the corection term becomes zero at the convergence of the enthalpy equation.
I tried searching the internet but could not find any FEM implementation is this field so I started developing a python solver from scratch in order to test the algorithm suggested in those papers using finite volume method, as at least I will have a solver ready to couple it with sfepy.
Ok, keep up the good work, and let us know about progress or problems. Once that solver works, you will have something to compare a new FEM solution with.
Cheers, r.
regards, Ankit On Friday, 6 September 2013 13:21:01 UTC+5:30, Robert Cimrman wrote:
Hi Ankit,
it looks very interesting. Do you have also a weak formulation of the complete problem? I would like to see the form
Find u, p, ... such that ... holds for all v, q...
to see if all the terms are available. Or do you have already an
initial
implementation? I will be offline from 7. to 11.9. but Vladimir should be able to answer your questions. I am available today.
r.
On 09/02/2013 10:53 PM, Ankit Mahato wrote:
Hi R,
Here is the final problem statement file containing all details.
regards, Ankit