all of them have lower spatial dimension than the space...
Right! I did not think that way... Hope to see 1D support soon.
On Friday, May 25, 2012 1:29:13 PM UTC+6, Robert Cimrman wrote:
Sure, it's a different thing. But those element share the "feature" that
them have lower spatial dimension than the space.
On 05/24/2012 06:04 PM, Md. Golam Rashed wrote:
Based on my limited knowledge, I think 1D
elements have no relation to
plate/shells, only beam/column or what we say truss elements are to be
considered 1D elements. Having options in plate/shells element is nice
its too advanced.
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 5:16:28 PM UTC+6, Robert Cimrman wrote:
> Thanks for the offer, but I am learning this topic myself. If I knew
> how to do it, it would be a piece of cake.
> If there is anybody with some coding experience related to
> etc., any remark/suggestion will be appreciated.
> On 05/22/2012 12:47 PM, Md. Golam Rashed wrote:
>> What sort of tasks one have to take to implement support for 1D
>> I'm also looking forward to it.
However, you can provide me with brief
>> instructions, see what I can do.
>> On Monday, May 21, 2012 1:58:08 AM UTC-7, Robert Cimrman wrote:
>>> Hi Nimish,
>>> the 1D elements are not currently supported, that's true. Also the 2D
>>> are supported only for 2D problems for now - no 2D elements embedded
>>> FYI: I am (slowly) adding the support for the elements of lower
>>> even the 1D elements are planned, but I cannot tell the time frame,
>>> of the code has to be updated to allow that.
>>> On 05/21/2012 07:57 AM, Nimish wrote:
>>>> I am currrently looking for FEM packages to help me solve a system
>>>> beams and columns, basically a
collection of 1D bernoulli/timoshenko
>>>> line elements.
>>>> I started reading SfePy docs and i am getting the idea that doing
>> above is not really possible here, am i right?
>> Are only 2D area elements permitted in SfePy?
>> Or is there any direct support for solving 1D line elements too..