Thank you for your instruction.
The tests/test_input_shell10x_cantilever.py passed without error as I
The tests/test_eigenvalue_solvers.py passed without error when atol=8.0e-2.
This test fails when atol=7.0e-2.
2016年5月6日金曜日 21時14分19秒 UTC+9 Robert Cimrman:
The tests/test_input_shell10x_cantilever.py failure is due to missing
scikit-umfpack - then the default scipy solver (superlu) is used, that has
slightly lower precision (and is much slower). I will increase the
tolerance in the example so that this test passes also without umfpack.
Not sure about tests/test_eigenvalue_solvers.py - the printed results are
correct - probably also just a too strict tolerance issue - could you try
increasing atol on line 132 of the test file to see whether then the test
On 05/06/2016 01:58 PM, pyontaku14 wrote:
I send the error report as attached.
For test_input_linear_elastic_probes.py, I installed vtk and solved the
2016年5月4日水曜日 23時01分24秒 UTC+9 Robert Cimrman:
> On 05/04/2016 03:42 PM, pyontaku14 wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>> Thank you for your answer.
>> I installed 2016.1.
>> Though there are 3 failures in the test, I try this version.
>> The failures are in eigenvalue_solvers, input_linear_elastic_probes
>> and shell10x_cantilever.
> Could you run the failed tests separately with --debug flag (see ),
> here the output? I suspect those failures are caused only by missing
solvers, but there might be some other problem.