Hi,
I'd like to be able to do these things with sfepy+sympy together:
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/NDSolvePDE.html
I.e. really just specify the equation in sympy and sfepy should be clever enough to solve it correctly, or say why it cannot solve it.
Ondrej
Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to be able to do these things with sfepy+sympy together:
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/NDSolvePDE.html
I.e. really just specify the equation in sympy and sfepy should be clever enough to solve it correctly, or say why it cannot solve it.
I would be nice to have, yes. But it is sort of eye-candy and I have more pressing things to do now, regarding sfepy functionality itself.
It would be on sympy to transform a user input to something sfepy could understand, right? For basic stuff (e.g. Laplacian) this won't be that difficult.
r.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Robert Cimrman cimr...@ntc.zcu.cz wrote: >
Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to be able to do these things with sfepy+sympy together:
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/NDSolvePDE.html
I.e. really just specify the equation in sympy and sfepy should be clever enough to solve it correctly, or say why it cannot solve it.
I would be nice to have, yes. But it is sort of eye-candy and I have more pressing things to do now, regarding sfepy functionality itself.
It would be on sympy to transform a user input to something sfepy could understand, right? For basic stuff (e.g. Laplacian) this won't be that difficult.
Yes, I am not saying you should do it, just that it would be useful and if I find time, I'll try it.
Ondrej
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Robert Cimrman cimr...@ntc.zcu.cz wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to be able to do these things with sfepy+sympy together:
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/NDSolvePDE.html
I.e. really just specify the equation in sympy and sfepy should be clever enough to solve it correctly, or say why it cannot solve it. I would be nice to have, yes. But it is sort of eye-candy and I have more pressing things to do now, regarding sfepy functionality itself.
It would be on sympy to transform a user input to something sfepy could understand, right? For basic stuff (e.g. Laplacian) this won't be that difficult.
Yes, I am not saying you should do it, just that it would be useful and if I find time, I'll try it.
It would be a cool thing, definitely! How is the tensor support in sympy going?
r.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Robert Cimrman cimr...@ntc.zcu.cz wrote: >
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Robert Cimrman cimr...@ntc.zcu.cz wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to be able to do these things with sfepy+sympy together:
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/NDSolvePDE.html
I.e. really just specify the equation in sympy and sfepy should be clever enough to solve it correctly, or say why it cannot solve it. I would be nice to have, yes. But it is sort of eye-candy and I have more pressing things to do now, regarding sfepy functionality itself.
It would be on sympy to transform a user input to something sfepy could understand, right? For basic stuff (e.g. Laplacian) this won't be that difficult.
Yes, I am not saying you should do it, just that it would be useful and if I find time, I'll try it.
It would be a cool thing, definitely! How is the tensor support in sympy going?
Stalling, other things have higher priority now.
Ondrej
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Robert Cimrman cimr...@ntc.zcu.cz wrote:
It would be a cool thing, definitely! How is the tensor support in sympy going?
Stalling, other things have higher priority now.
Same here :] Good luck with your thesis!
r.