Mailman 3 April 2003 - SpamBayes

Re: [Spambayes] message.py bugs
by Tim Stone - Four Stones Expressions April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

I checked in a fix for this last night, after it bit me too... :) 4/29/2003 3:41:59 AM, Oliver Maunder <lists(a)olivermaunder.co.uk> wrote: >Hi all (and Tim especially) > >I've got a problem with the latest version of Message.py (1.24) > >The problem is in line 193 - in class Message > > return self._force_CRLF(message.SBHeaderMessage.as_string(self)) > >The interpreter says it doesn't understand "message". Presumably this is >because we're already inside message.py. > >Removing "message." makes things worse. SBHeaderMessage.as_string gets >called, but SBHeaderMessage doesn't have it's own as_string method, so >the version in Message gets called, which in turn calls >SBHeaderMessage.as_string, and infinite recursion ensues. > >I've got round this by doing: > return self._force_CRLF(email.Message.Message.as_string(self)) > >Don't know if this does exacly what you intend, but it works for now. Is >there a "super" or "parent" object you can use to call a method in the >parent class? It would save typing "email.Message.Message". > >I got a python book yesterday, so I'll stop asking these questions soon :-) > >Olly > > > >_______________________________________________ >Spambayes mailing list >Spambayes(a)python.org >http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes > > c'est moi - TimS http://www.fourstonesExpressions.com http://wecanstopspam.org There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't.

1 0

message.py bugs
by Oliver Maunder April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

Hi all (and Tim especially) I've got a problem with the latest version of Message.py (1.24) The problem is in line 193 - in class Message return self._force_CRLF(message.SBHeaderMessage.as_string(self)) The interpreter says it doesn't understand "message". Presumably this is because we're already inside message.py. Removing "message." makes things worse. SBHeaderMessage.as_string gets called, but SBHeaderMessage doesn't have it's own as_string method, so the version in Message gets called, which in turn calls SBHeaderMessage.as_string, and infinite recursion ensues. I've got round this by doing: return self._force_CRLF(email.Message.Message.as_string(self)) Don't know if this does exacly what you intend, but it works for now. Is there a "super" or "parent" object you can use to call a method in the parent class? It would save typing "email.Message.Message". I got a python book yesterday, so I'll stop asking these questions soon :-) Olly

2 1

[ spambayes-Bugs-729345 ] Outlook 2000/Win98SE failed
by SourceForge.net April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

Bugs item #729345, was opened at 2003-04-29 15:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=729345&group_i… Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Oram (poram) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2000/Win98SE failed Initial Comment: Have installed the 002 binary for the Outlook Add-in, however after installation the add-in fails to place the button on the toolbar. Have attached the log-file with it's generated errors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-04-29 21:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks, but dupe of 725449, even though you would have been very hard-pressed to know. I changed the summary of that one to better reflect this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=729345&group_i…

1 0

[ spambayes-Bugs-725449 ] Binary plugin fails on Win9x
by SourceForge.net April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

Bugs item #725449, was opened at 2003-04-22 14:41 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=725449&group_i… Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: dan maer (dmara) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Binary plugin fails on Win9x Initial Comment: Running pure Windows (98SE) and Outlook 2000. No Python installed. I can't get the plugin to initialize. I go to Tools/options/other/advanced options/Com Addins and check the SpamBayes plug-in box, but it won't stayed checked, and I've uninstalled/reinstalled Outlook and the plugin but no go. I've got this working great, really great, on Winnt 4.0 and Xp. Logfile being attached for upload... Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: J (usertgo) Date: 2003-04-26 15:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=763953 ok, since i liked it so much on win2000 i did the python install & manual install of the spambayes outlook addin & its working good now, so i guess it was the installer. thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: J (usertgo) Date: 2003-04-24 15:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=763953 I also get the same errors as in the logfile on a Win98SE installation w/Outlook 2000 SP1, but it works on Win2000 w/same Outlook. If you have any workarounds (w/regedit?) please let us know... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: dan maer (dmara) Date: 2003-04-23 13:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=759684 Ok Mark... Anyway to bypass the installer issue and get it working by manual means? Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-04-23 09:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is an issue with the "Installer" tool I use. I will try and sus it out before the next binary release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=725449&group_i…

1 0

[ spambayes-Bugs-729345 ] Outlook 2000/Win98SE failed
by SourceForge.net April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

Bugs item #729345, was opened at 2003-04-29 15:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=729345&group_i… Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Oram (poram) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2000/Win98SE failed Initial Comment: Have installed the 002 binary for the Outlook Add-in, however after installation the add-in fails to place the button on the toolbar. Have attached the log-file with it's generated errors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=729345&group_i…

1 0

Bug [ 725449 ] Addin won't initialize
by Jerry Williams April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-002.exe worked so well under Windows 2000 that I decided to remove Python 2.2 and the win32 stuff and just use the Outlook setup. But I run into the same problem as this bug. So just as an FYI I am running Windows ME. So I just reinstalled Python and the win32all-152.exe and spambayes-1.0a2.tar.gz and it remembered all of my settings. So now I have a question. Where is the config stored? Mark H. and everyone else, thanks for a great program! P.S. I am going to dump WinME just as soon as I can move everything to Win2000.

2 1

RE: [Spambayes] Bug [ 725449 ] Addin won't initialize
by Meyer, Tony April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

> So now I have a question. Where is the config stored? At the moment the configuration for the Outlook plugin is stored in two files. These will most probably be called default_configuration.pck and default_bayes_customize.ini. The pickle (.pck) stores things specific to the plugin (like ids for the folders you are filtering), and the ini file stores spambayes-wide settings, like tokenisation settings. Where these files are found depends on your system - they get put into the folder that the OS tells spambayes is most appropriate for application data. On Win2k/XP, this will be in the Documents and Settings/username/Application Data/ path; on earlier versions, this might be the spambayes directory itself. =Tony Meyer

1 0

RE: [Spambayes] big imapfilter.py problem
by Meyer, Tony April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

> OK, now everything worked, sort of: > > %setenv PYTHONPATH ~/src/email-2.5 > %python imapfilter.py -t -c -v > Loading database hammie.db... Loading state from > hammie.db database > hammie.db is a new database > Done. > Training > Training ham folder HamBox > 0 trained. > Training spam folder SpamBox > 0 trained. > Training took 51.954687953 seconds, 0 messages were trained > Classifying > Filtering took 1.34056997299 seconds. > > But no messages got classified spam or unsure, AFAICT. > Even after I move some of the spam training messages into my > inbox, they're not classified as spam. Everything *should* be classified as unsure, since it's a new db and nothing was trained. Looks like it's not reading the messages at all. I'll take another look at it - I was a bit rushed when I did the code to stop relying on the UIDs. =Tony Meyer

1 0

RE: [Spambayes] gratuitous changes? + bugs
by Meyer, Tony April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

> I guess it's my fault for not reading every message in the > spambayes group. It's just too much! :-) I do try and make the important ones like that stand out, but I can understand how they could be missed easily enough. > It's one of my own scripts. None of the available scripts > does what I need, so I wrote my own. And in order to keep my > scripts independent of any spambayes testing that I was doing > at the time, I used mergefiles to merge in my own settings. Well, I was wrong anyway since hammiefilter did call mergefiles as well (how the search missed that, I don't know). I'll be more rigorous about the cvs logs next time, promise. > If you look at the diff you'll see that I changed the test > touching self.allowed_values. That is *allowed* values. Ah, I get it now, sorry - I should have read the diff more closely. It's the code in is_boolean that fails. I thought you meant code in the is_valid test, which should work fine. I'll check a fix in for this ASAP. =Tony Meyer

1 0

[ spambayes-Bugs-728886 ] In the pop3 UI not able to pass more than 1 server
by SourceForge.net April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

Bugs item #728886, was opened at 2003-04-29 00:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=728886&group_i… Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: In the pop3 UI not able to pass more than 1 server Initial Comment: Hi, Using the Web UI to set the options for pop3proxy does not work. For Servers: I pass the string "mail.isp1.ca,pop.isp2.ca,pop.isp3.net" (without the " " ) In the file UserInterface.py before line 576 value = mail.isp1.ca,pop.isp2.ca,pop.isp3.net but after line 577 value = (mail.isp1.ca,pop.isp2.ca,pop.isp3.net,) Then you get this error message when you try to save # 'mail.gmc.isp1.ca,pop.isp2.ca,pop.isp3.net' is not a value valid for [POP3 Proxy Options] Servers # '6110,6111, 6112' is not a value valid for [POP3 Proxy Options] Ports Remi papaDoc(a)videotron.ca ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-04-29 11:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed in latest cvs. Sorry, my fault again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=728886&group_i…

1 0