April 1, 2003
5:14 a.m.
At 19:59 -0500 31/03/2003, in message RE: RE: [Spambayes] Latest spammer trick stymied, Tim Peters wrote:
[Tim Stone]
I'm not sure if this would have pushed it toward spamminess or not, but it bears researching.
Look in your database for the spamprob on 'proto:http'. My bet is that it's near neutral;
Number of spam messages: 470. Number of ham messages: 224. Probability that a message containing this word is spam: 0.643541700966. So, for my kind of mails, it is on the spam side of things ;-) -- Hofstadter's Law : It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law.