On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:

> Great! Then I'm happy with moving PyPy benchmarks over wholesale. Are there
> any benchmarks that are *really* good and are thus a priority to move, or
> any that are just flat-out bad and I shouldn't bother moviing?

Note that not all benchmarks run nightly. twisted_accept for example
run out of TCP connections. benchmarks.py is your helper. We improved
the US runner qutie significantly (the main runner.py file), mostly by
improving reporting. So it can save a .json file or upload stuff to a
codespeed instance.

Other than that, they all measure something. It's really up to you to
decide which ones measure "something significant". Of course for our
purposes benchmarks which require large libs are more interesting than
others, but they all do something interesting. We removed those that
we consider completely uninteresting.