On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski email@example.com:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Brett Cannon firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Great! Then I'm happy with moving PyPy benchmarks over wholesale. Are
any benchmarks that are *really* good and are thus a priority to move, or any that are just flat-out bad and I shouldn't bother moviing?
Note that not all benchmarks run nightly. twisted_accept for example run out of TCP connections. benchmarks.py is your helper. We improved the US runner qutie significantly (the main runner.py file), mostly by improving reporting. So it can save a .json file or upload stuff to a codespeed instance.
One thing at a time. =)
Other than that, they all measure something. It's really up to you to decide which ones measure "something significant". Of course for our purposes benchmarks which require large libs are more interesting than others, but they all do something interesting. We removed those that we consider completely uninteresting.
I will start with ones that will port to Python 3 easily, then go from there.