On 13 April 2017 at 02:15, Victor Stinner email@example.com wrote:
2017-04-12 10:52 GMT+02:00 Victor Stinner firstname.lastname@example.org:
I'm running benchmarks with this option. Once results will be ready, I will remove the old 2.7 result to replace it with the new one.
Done. speed.python.org now uses UCS-4 on Python 2.7. Is it better now?
Previous JSON file: https://github.com/haypo/performance_results/raw/master/2017-03-31-cpython/2...
I see small performance differences, but they don't seem to be related to UTF-16 => UCS-4, but more random noise.
Given that lack of divergence and the known Unicode correctness problems in narrow builds, I guess it doesn't make much sense to invest time in benchmarking both of them.