On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul Moore p.f.moore@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/04/2008, Benjamin Peterson musiccomposition@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Brett Cannon brett@python.org wrote:
So simplejson is going to be added to the stdlib (this came down from up high, which is why there has not been more of a discussion here). That means we need to choose a name. Obviously 'json' would work,
but
I am not sure if there is something better. Remember, we want simple so that if someone goes, "I wonder if Python has a JSON module",
they
can easily find it (which means no crazy package names).
+1 for "json" or "jsonlib". Simple is better.
+1 for json. Let's not have yet another xxxlib format name...
+1 for json as well. I agree the lib suffix should be avoided whenever possible.
Paul. _______________________________________________ stdlib-sig mailing list stdlib-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig