Re: [stdlib-sig] Suggested tweaks to http and xmlrpc packages

On Feb 4, 2008 1:03 PM, Alexandre Vassalotti wrote:

On Feb 4, 2008 2:38 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:

...

So the suggestions now are:

httplib ->http.client http.server proposal stays.

xmlrpclib -> xmlrpc.client xmlrpc.server proposal stays.

`xmlrpclib` also contains (un)marshaling tools, so it's not strictly a client library. Anyway, I like the "client" subpackage name more than "tools."

Well, I went ahead and made the change in the PEP (since the renamings won't happen until Guido clears the PEP none of this is in stone, although I don't want to constantly change the PEP either). -Brett