
Sept. 18, 2009
2:52 a.m.
Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek@...> writes:
That would be great. With an option to make the logger instance 'standalone' (e.g. blocking the propagation of the messages to the other handler to avoid the problem you've described below)
That could work. The additional keyword argument would be propagate, defaulting to None, and (if not specified) internally set as True if no logger name is provided, or False if it is. Let's just wait to see if any other ideas pop up. Regards, Vinay Sajip