![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4021eb3a9a363520e27c736cec6905e6.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Oct 12, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
Jesse Noller <jnoller@...> writes:
In all seriousness, why not do something like what we started with the threading module? We added pep8 aliases and started marking the old API deprecated. They'll follow the common deprecation guidelines we already have.
That, plus the dict config option you mentioned plus a doc re-org would probably go a long way to improving the PR of the module.
It's just a question of priorities and timing. Clearly, the dict config option, other functional enhancements and documentation reorganisation should take priority.
I'm waiting for a little while to see what feedback comes in from python-dev about the dict config functionality. I've been in touch with Doug Hellmann on the documentation reorganisation and am waiting for some feedback from him, and I've started to put together some diagrams which will hopefully help clarify some aspects of the documentation.
Jesse keeps bugging me to review PyCon proposals ;-), so I haven't had a chance to dig into the doc work, yet. It's still on my list, though. Doug