On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Brett Cannon email@example.com wrote:
So simplejson is going to be added to the stdlib (this came down from up high, which is why there has not been more of a discussion here). That means we need to choose a name. Obviously 'json' would work, but I am not sure if there is something better. Remember, we want simple so that if someone goes, "I wonder if Python has a JSON module", they can easily find it (which means no crazy package names).
+1 for "json" or "jsonlib". Simple is better.
We might also act as quality control on the source code to make sure it is up to snuff based on PEP 8.
I'll have a look.
-Brett _______________________________________________ stdlib-sig mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig