Michael Foord schrieb:
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le mardi 15 septembre 2009 à 17:14 -0400, R. David Murray a écrit :
Actually I believe I heard from someone other than Laura that required options were explicitly rejected.
This is one of the reasons why I'm against exclusive module ownership. If a reasonable number of people think a feature would benefit the community, the module owner shouldn't be able to veto it on ideological (or whatever other personal) grounds.
I dislike exclusive module ownership too. We end up in situations where modules (like ElementTree) are 'owned' by someone who is absent and no-one else is able to (or dares to) touch the code.
Well, one part of module ownership would be to complain about and/or revert unwanted changes. Which one obviously cannot do when absent or inactive :) Georg -- Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less. Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out.