xml-rpc package proposal (was: http package proposal)
On Jan 29, 2008 5:20 PM, Alexandre Vassalotti <alexandre@peadrop.com> wrote:
Sounds good. Is there any plan to do a similar packaging with the xmlrpc-related modules? For example,
xmlrpclib -> xmlrpc.tools SimpleXMLRPCServer -> xmlrpc.server DocXMLRPCServer -> xmlrpc.server
I had not gotten that far (just doing them as I find time to bother to think about and send an email), but I like your proposal. What do others think? -Brett
Le mardi 29 janvier 2008 à 18:04 -0800, Brett Cannon a écrit :
On Jan 29, 2008 5:20 PM, Alexandre Vassalotti <alexandre@peadrop.com> wrote:
Sounds good. Is there any plan to do a similar packaging with the xmlrpc-related modules? For example,
xmlrpclib -> xmlrpc.tools SimpleXMLRPCServer -> xmlrpc.server DocXMLRPCServer -> xmlrpc.server
I had not gotten that far (just doing them as I find time to bother to think about and send an email), but I like your proposal. What do others think?
It sounds good. The WeirdCamelCaseModuleNames are simply very annoying. regards Antoine.
participants (2)
-
Antoine Pitrou -
Brett Cannon