standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)

Hi List, Guido said:
At Google we use a hacked-up version of pylint which seems infinitely flexible in the checks you can specify. I assume that the public version of pylint is just as capable -- someone just needs to write a rule for it.
Now that you mention it... I have tried in the past to get people from Google to contribute these changes back to the trunk_, but without success. There will be a `pylint bug day`_ via internet on nov 25th, 2009. Any chance you could pass the info to the Google employees in charge of the hacked-up version of pylint ? .. _trunk: http://www.logilab.org/hg/pylint .. _`pylint bug day`: http://www.logilab.org/blogentry/18781 Thanks in advance, PS: If someone else from the list is reading this and wants to join and maybe implement the checking rule mentionned above in the thread, please do! -- Nicolas Chauvat logilab.fr - services en informatique scientifique et gestion de connaissances
participants (1)
-
Nicolas Chauvat