Nov. 18, 2005
2:53 a.m.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:55:37 -0500, "Clark C. Evans" <cce@clarkevans.com> wrote:
Anyway Glyph, I'm not quite certain I understand what you're saying or recommending. If you could detail a bit more, it would be wonderful.
I'll try to provide more detail later. I'm also trying to digest your "stage"-based approach here. Although certainly possible to implement in terms of t.w/w2/nevow abstractions it seems rather alien to the mindset involved.