Jan. 30, 2005
12:18 p.m.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:36:03PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: [...]
Yep. And if it's still *that* slow, then we should rewrite *zope.interfaces* (not compy) with pyrex. what's the point of writing compy with pyrex and leaving zope.interfaces dogslow? We should do that once for all if we do it.
zope.interface already has an (optional) C module with optimisations in it. -Andrew.