Re: [Twisted-web] Different behavior of twistd with and without -n
"Seb" == S�bastien LELONG <sebastien.lelong@dexia-securities.fr> writes:
Seb> FWIW, I have an application running CherryPy over Twisted, using Seb> PyLucene. Since PyLucene isn't thread-safe, every thread must Seb> subclass PyLucene.PythonThread, so the underlying "java runtime Seb> garbage collector is aware about the python thread upon their Seb> creation" Seb> (http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/pylucene-dev/2004-June/000037.html). Seb> Without this, the apps simply crashes (segfault, see also Seb> http://chandlerproject.org/PyLucene/ThreadingInPyLucene). Maybe Seb> there's something about that while twistd is daemonizing the process ? Hi S�bastien. I read those pages at some point, but seeing as my code doesn't use threads I never paid that much attention. My app runs through the code where it crashes multiple times before things die, so I'm not suffering from the kind of segfaulting you saw. From what I can tell, something is deliberately calling abort(3) when it detects a problem. It doesn't look like a signal is received or a system call is failing. Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I hope I'm understanding you right - that it's not an issue for me as I'm not using threads directly (but is Twisted? I'm not sure). Terry
participants (1)
-
Terry Jones