And since it's come up, no, I didn't mean that either. It was a (somewhat colorful) description of my perspective on the question. Dustin On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Glyph <glyph@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
On Aug 19, 2014, at 5:05 AM, exarkun@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 03:31 am, sank.daniel@gmail.com wrote:
Dustin,
Adding what amounts to a use-after-free bug to the protocol seems like a really bad idea to me.
Oh goody, a sarcastic comment which doesn't actually bother to explain the bug :)
Sarcastic? What? Dustin *was* explaining the problem. Without sarcasm, so far as I can tell.
My response may have come across as a little ambiguous, so let me also say - I think use-after-free is a pretty accurate description of the issue as well, I don't believe this was intended sarcastically.
-glyph
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python