That looks awesome.
I can't find a license for it. I'm publishing some third-party helpers for twisted's amp implementation as I need them myself (presumably I'll make a formal release announcement at the Pycon sprints). Do you mind if I copy this code? I can't seem to find a license. (txampext is ISC-licensed, which I assume is congruent to your sensibilities :))
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:17 PM, email@example.com wrote:
On 03:34 pm, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
I have no issue writing AMP responders TTD-edly, they work pretty much the way any other code would. However, I did notice that the only way I'd notice if my Command definitions themselves were broken were if my functional tests start failing.
Chris and I wrote all the AMP-using code for game TDD. See game/test/test_network.py in lp:game.
It would be nice if I could write unit test driven Command specifications, as well.
The quickest I could come up with was to call makeArguments/makeResponse with a few known-good/known-bad dictionaries, and see if it blows up. Is there a smarter way to do it?
-- cheers lvh
Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python