Sept. 25, 2006
1:39 a.m.
glyph@divmod.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:54:15 -0400, Itamar Shtull-Trauring [...]
So as long we are up front and visible about existing limitations in these reactors, our users benefit by us including them.
I don't think we have nearly enough visibility on the quality or stability of those reactors. "Stability: Unstable" means "we might change this", not "it is known to be broken and to fail numerous tests".
As a tangent, people seem to get confused by this. Perhaps it would be less ambiguous to replace "Stability: Unstable" with something like: API status: in flux or: API status: unsupported and "Stability: stable" with: API status: supported Just to remove the ambiguity? -Andrew.