Aug. 20, 2014
5:21 a.m.
On Aug 19, 2014, at 5:05 AM, exarkun@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 03:31 am, sank.daniel@gmail.com wrote:
Dustin,
Adding what amounts to a use-after-free bug to the protocol seems like a really bad idea to me.
Oh goody, a sarcastic comment which doesn't actually bother to explain the bug :)
Sarcastic? What? Dustin *was* explaining the problem. Without sarcasm, so far as I can tell.
My response may have come across as a little ambiguous, so let me also say - I think use-after-free is a pretty accurate description of the issue as well, I don't believe this was intended sarcastically. -glyph