June 5, 2008
3:49 p.m.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:10 AM, <glyph@divmod.com> wrote:
On 02:58 pm, mike@mkp.ca wrote:
(eg, give the trademark to a not-for-profit)
That is exactly what we intend to do. I thought I mentioned it in the initial post; if not, sorry about that. The whole point of having a defensible trademark is having something that the SFC can do something about :).
So DivMod would not have any influence whatsoever over who is prosecuted? That sounds more reasonable. Sorry, I can't seem to make myself go past this kind of thread without saying something 100% useless. It's a disease of some kind.