correction. I was stupidly reprocessing list on remote copy side. Seeing much better results now ~10K per second.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Kevin Mcintyre firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
I experimented today with a table scan from dynamodb. Taking each record and converting to a dictionary into a list. Initial scan and transform took ~8 seconds from amazon to my house over TCP boto which is soapish? i think. ~7800 records.
The next call for the remote copy took 7 seconds across the bus. Is that expected?
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz email@example.com wrote:
On Aug 8, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Kevin Mcintyre firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
I think so too, but I'm starting to lean toward websockets. The warnings alone right?
Websockets are a layer well below what PB does. In fact you could run PB over websockets, and it would work roughly the same as over TCP.
But I will take another pass and report back any success.
Please do let us know.
Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python