Il lun, 2003-12-15 alle 15:34, Dave Peticolas ha scritto:
On Sun, 2003-12-14 at 09:21, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
Il dom, 2003-12-14 alle 17:48, Dave Peticolas ha scritto: [snip]
Evidently not impossible, as Bill Gribble has a patch adding
eheh. yesss. i should have added "without leaving a thread suspended". my fault.
this support to the existing adbapi.py. But it still may be simpler to support an extended transaction api by going away from a thread pool. In either case, we should not have two separate modules.
agreed. see my later mail; Bill's patch is fine if we can get it in.
I'd like to have some tests for it before it goes in. I might have some time over holiday break to work on some.
i can do the tests too. can we coordinate over irc or IM? -- Federico Di Gregorio http://people.initd.org/fog Debian GNU/Linux Developer fog@debian.org INIT.D Developer fog@initd.org Viviamo in un mondo reale, Ciccio. -- Lucy