On 17 November 2014 11:55, <exarkun@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
On 11:48 am, adi@roiban.ro wrote:
Is there a reason why a try scheduler is not implemented? I find it awesome for TDD!
On my normal workflow I can do this, even without commiting changes:
./HELPER test some.test ./HELPER test-remote sol-10-sparc some.test
test-remote just wraps buildot try --builder --properties --wait --vc
Because it requires setting up proper credentials to access control the feature.
But there are already credentials for the HTTP status page... why not configure the same credentials for buildbot try? What I would like to hear is something like this: * buildbot try is too simple, does not work with our workflow and for our project... we don't want to spend time implementing it or * buildbot try could help, it still has some problems and we don't have time to fix issue 1, 2, 3, ... etc -- Adi Roiban