On 1/17/07, Fernando Perez <fperez.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/17/07, Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun@divmod.com> wrote:
> > It looks like a single core on a T1000 is much less powerful than a single
> > core in a Dell 2850, so this might account for some of the difference.
That is precisely the case. A quote
Obviously, the UltraSparc T1 will perform quite poorly on workloads
that require single-threaded performance. For those types of
non-multithreaded workloads, Sun will rely for the time being on its
Opteron-powered Galaxy server line. In 2008, however, Sun plans to
release a new design codenamed "Rock" with better single-threaded
performance.
taken from
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20051114-5569.html
You can find a bit more info here:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20051116-5584.htm
This Sun hardware is built /specifically/ for running /highly/
multithreaded code, it has always sucked royally at single-threaded
performance, this was very much a design decision.
There is a "backend" C module that our Twisted server front ends, and it is highly multi-threaded.
So the T1000 is PERFECT for our application, except that now Twisted is the bottleneck. :-(
Unfortunately we have a 11th hour constraint of a vendor library that we are required to use, it is only available on Sparc Solaris.