Hello, 2010/4/26 Itamar Turner-Trauring <itamar@itamarst.org>:
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 15:56 +0000, exarkun@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
This is mainly a question of when someone finds it interesting enough to review the code. Personally, while I remember commenting on that ticket a couple months ago, I had to go re-read the wikipedia page to remember what OSC is. Since this is a protocol I've never come across before and which I can't think of any immediate applications that are relevant to me, it's not likely I'll spontaneously go review the code. Perhaps there is another developer who would be interested in this who will do so. Posting on the list is a good way to try to get attention, as is asking in the Freenode #twisted irc channel. If you can't find someone who wants to review it just because they're interested, you might be able to trade for a review of another ticket.
As a worst case alternative if time becomes an issue, you can release this as a standalone project (many Twisted libraries have begun prefixing package names with tx, e.g. txAMPQ). It can always be merged later with Twisted if there's an interest (as long as the license doesn't conflict).
Yes, I guess we should use it a bit in productions so that we test it thorougly. It won't be in the release in early June, so I guess we should call it txosc for a few months before we submit it again to be merged. The API might change while I use it in some projects. Note that it is fully working right now, and we have completed the unit tests. My only concern is this: if we make it a standalone project, I might want to split it in three files, whereas it is in just one right now. Maybe it's ok to create a subpackage in the in twisted.prototocols, though, like the "gps" and "mice" subpackages. Thanks, Alex
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
-- Alexandre Quessy http://alexandre.quessy.net/