On 10:35 pm, jkakar@kakar.ca wrote:
>Glyph has been kind enough to share some of his ideas about adding
>streaming support to AMP via private mail.  He suggested that the
>discussion should really be on the list.  Here's the relevant technical
>details we've discussed so far:


As a finger-exercise today I banged out a tedious, untested and highly buggy proof-of-concept of the API proposed there.  It seems to work OK; the main open question is how the command-responders for "you got a chunk of data on this channel", "please throttle this channel", and "this channel is done" should be associated with the protocol.