May 27, 2016
1:31 p.m.
On 27 May 2016 at 13:13, Itamar Turner-Trauring <itamar@itamarst.org> wrote:
[snip] I think they're fine to accept insofar as:
1. There is strong ongoing momentum for the port now, so these changes makes porting module-by-module easier and won't just bitrot.
How do you define a "strong ongoing momentum" ?
2. They're doing one particular incompatibility at a time, rather than "here's an assortment of random changes to a module that may or may not port that module fully, who knows."
Some code parts don't have python 2.7 coverage . Is is still acceptable to touch that code ? :) Regards, Adi -- Adi Roiban