May 2, 2014
9:16 p.m.
On May 2, 2014, at 1:02 PM, meejah <meejah@meejah.ca> wrote:
Another point for this is that "someday" tor will have UDP support...
There's a reason that the existing interfaces all have "stream" in their names :-). The main reason we didn't do "datagram" at the same time is that there's a pretty clear client/server division in all stream endpoints (one side has to initiate, the other side has to respond) but given the possibilities for multicast / fan-out / fan-in with datagram sockets, "just do what UDP does" didn't seem obviously correct. I'd love it if someone with an interest would make some datagram endpoint interfaces though. -glyph