On 02:20 am, itamar@futurefoundries.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Jonathan Jacobs < jonathan+twisted@jsphere.com> wrote:
Should the IRI branch be finished before attempting this ticket? (Note that this doesn't necessarily include my volunteering.)
The IRI ticket should *not* be a dependency. It would be nice, but it's unlikely it will happen anytime soon.
The hard part of the IRI ticket is parsing all the extremely complex forms in which an IRI can appear, right? If so, I agree. However, there's no reason we can't have an object that represents an IRI *without* writing a parser for all those forms. Agent only needs minimal functionality of being able to figure out the hostname, port number, and whatever makes up the rest. Jean-Paul