On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:33:22 -0700, Andrew Bennetts <andrew-twisted@puzzling.org> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:10:05PM -0400, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
To Mary and Alex:
Ask a lawyer (or someone else who's silly enough to answer :).
I doubt a lawyer could answer Alex's question about the rationale for the change :)
Well, I was focusing on his "what's the difference", which I can't answer. I guess I'll risk it: The rationale is that MIT (presumably) allows people to derive from the work without keeping derived works open, and that's what glyph wanted now that Twisted has matured. Also, the Twisted codebase is (presumably) not at the whim of glyph any more, since all contributors (if they want) are listed as copyright holders, not just glyph. -- Twisted | Christopher Armstrong: International Man of Twistery Radix | Release Manager, Twisted Project ---------+ http://radix.twistedmatrix.com