On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:54:33 -0500, Nathan <nathan.stocks@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Terry Jones <terry@jon.es> wrote:
You're not using deferreds properly. In the simple/typical case, when you call a function that returns a deferred, you will want to add (at least) a
I don't think that's true. Jean-Paul was the one who told me to do it that way in the first place:
http://twistedmatrix.com/pipermail/twisted-python/2008-April/017304.html
Terry (hi Terry) is correct here. Your interpretation of Jean-Paul Calderone's message is flawed, although I certainly understand how the misinterpretation could occur. There's a big difference between the AMP example in that thread, and the example code you posted to this thread.
If your theory was true, I would be getting garbage everywhere I return (and use) complicated objects, and I'd be getting True everywhere that I return booleans.
Not necessarily. I suspect that your real code isn't working the way your posted example does. The bottom line is that the code you posted to this thread does not produce the synchronous behavior that you think it is providing, so it might be more helpful to provide an example of your real code, in order for people here to provide you with some better answers. Hope this helps, L. Daniel Burr