Nov. 18, 2004
5:58 p.m.
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 12:04 -0500, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
Based on what Bob is saying the CF reactor is in same state as Qt, where it runs correctly but has issues with the tests, so I think we should keep it (and of course as with Qt investigate ways of fixing this).
If these test failures are really not bad enough to keep things out of the release, why aren't they set to .todo, perhaps specifically in the case of the reactors which break them? In any event, a document clearly listing the limitations of all the reactors would be good. I vaguely remember we had one at some point. Is it up to date?