Dec. 3, 2014
12:55 a.m.
On Dec 2, 2014, at 20:05, exarkun@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
Are there lots of useless docstrings on nested function definitions purely for the sake of twistedchecker? Or are there undocumented nested functions that are actually a little bit difficult to understand on their own?
twistedchecker does not presently require nested function definitions to have docstrings. I recently merged a fix to an incongruity where it was requiring this of classes defined within functions: <https://github.com/twisted/twistedchecker/commit/4af4e97f99d6e5f683b65272a8d...>. So this one, at least, we can cross off for the future :). -glyph