On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Andrew Bennetts <andrew@bemusement.org> wrote:
Kevin Horn wrote:
[…]
> Why?  What does this buy us?  To me it seems more complicated, requires
[…]
>
> If it's just an incremental transition, then I think we can get that
> without resorting to relying on the guts of two fairly complicated systems.

Although I'm blissfully ignorant of the deeper, darker details of
docutils and sphinx (and hope to remain so), I feel compelled to point
out that an incremental transition is more than a “just”.  You can start
reaping the rewards of the new system sooner and with less risk than an
all-or-nothing transition, it reduces merge conflicts for
work-in-progress doc branches, etc.

So I'd say incremental transition is closer to a “must” than a “just”!

-Andrew.

Yes, that was "just" in the sense of "only", rather than in the sense of "merely". :)


--
Kevin Horn