7 Oct
2009
7 Oct
'09
3:13 a.m.
On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Matt Perry wrote:
One thing of note is that you say you have concurrency issues handled -- but with asynchronous I/O, there are no concurrency issues, since there's no concurrency (at least, not at application level). This is confusing at first but it's important to understand.
The concurrency to which I was referring was having multiple deferreds adding to the "getlist" semi-simultaneously. They have to obtain a lock on the "getlist" before they can add new things to "get", then they release it. Thanks, S