On Jul 2, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Michael Thompson wrote:
On 1 July 2011 18:38, Glyph Lefkowitz firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
I think github means less effort for the reviewer because they can review commits, rather than a large diff. They can review changes following a review.
I already review diffs this way, with a local bzr-svn branch using 'bzr merge; bzr qlog'. Better yet I just sometimes do this on a plane :).
They can have a tool to make comments next to the code and it is less effort to apply patches and update branches to HEAD.
This would be nice. Is it easy for the reviewee to look at all the comments in an ordered list?