19 Oct
2016
19 Oct
'16
9:47 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, at 05:45 PM, Itamar Turner-Trauring wrote:
Well... I had a test that went through synchronous Deferred path. And yeah, it was easier to write than async test. But it failed to catch a bug that was only in async case. So the problem I see is that supporting both in Deferred means you need twice the number of tests each time you use Deferreds.
Er, that was unclear. I had a bug that wasn't caught by tests because it passed with sync Deferred and failed with async Deferred callback, and I didn't have tests for latter. -- Itamar Turner-Trauring