On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 at 22:48, Kyle Altendorf <sda@fstab.net> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022, at 13:44, Chris Withers wrote:
At this point, it feels like any available energy could be more usefully employed in getting a pytest plugin that really supported the Twisted reactor in place. Re-inventing wheels like coverage just doesn't seem sensible at this point.
I don't expect to invest a lot of time in pytes-twisted, but I am curious what you mean by supporting the Twisted reactor in place. A new reactor for each test?
FYIW I'm also +1 to try to get Twisted support for pytest , stdlib unit test or nose. I guess that many of the existing Twisted based projects are using `trial` so things are not that easy. For now, for my project I am running Twisted tests with trial and some custom realtor start and stop, but the long term plan is to migrate to pytest. Regards -- Adi Roiban