On May 30, 2018, at 10:04 PM, Jason Litzinger email@example.com wrote:
Any thoughts on why no traceback is printed for case 1? Is it even worth worrying about?
My guess is that since `d` is at the global scope, it doesn't get garbage collected until some unfortunately late phase in the interpreter tear-down where maybe stderr isn't even available any more.
I'd definitely ignore this case for now and fix the others, which are much more serious, and tractable to fix ;).