On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 14:22 +0100, Tim Terlegård wrote:
Also, IMHO, simpleftpclient.py and simplesshclient.py should differ only one or very few lines, the authentication part. Everything else should be the same.
Am I making sense? What do you think about this?
"Yes please".
You're saying that VFS is a good idea and that I should implement it? As I'm no twisted guru I'd like some guidance, please. Has this been thought about before? Is something like this considered for 2.0? Are there any difficulties implementing it?
Tim
At some stage this year I'll be implementing a related thing for work, most probably given back to twisted; A twisted VFS server, the concept will be to provide a simple tree that represents a filesystem, which will then be published via webDAV (which we will implement for twisted), FTP, sambaVFS etc.. I guess this is the opposite of what your takling about, your interested in a client to other existing services. The reason I bring this up is that they seem like two halves of the same project. -tjs