On 4 Apr 2016, at 09:32, John Aherne <johnaherne@rocs.co.uk> wrote:

Cory

Thanks for the detailed reply.

I'll see what I can make of it.

I must admit I don't see Google paying much attention to this.

It does work if I use response.deliverBody, but I thought getting the complete response in one hit would be better.

John

Yeah, so the difference is that with response.deliverBody you’re not checking the code in connectionLost. If you were, you’d be seeing PotentialDataLoss as well. ;) There’s nothing wrong with using readBody, you just need to adjust your errback/callback chain to transform the response appropriately in this case. And yeah, I doubt Google will listen. =P Cory

On 4 Apr 2016, at 09:32, John Aherne <johnaherne@rocs.co.uk> wrote:

Cory

Thanks for the detailed reply.

I'll see what I can make of it.

I must admit I don't see Google paying much attention to this.

It does work if I use response.deliverBody, but I thought getting the complete response in one hit would be better.

John

Yeah, so the difference is that with response.deliverBody you’re not checking the code in connectionLost. If you were, you’d be seeing PotentialDataLoss as well. ;) There’s nothing wrong with using readBody, you just need to adjust your errback/callback chain to transform the response appropriately in this case. And yeah, I doubt Google will listen. =P Cory