On Jul 2, 2011 10:28 p.m., "Glyph Lefkowitz" <glyph@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:

On Jul 2, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Michael Thompson wrote:

...

On 1 July 2011 18:38, Glyph Lefkowitz <glyph@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:

...

I think github means less effort for the reviewer because they can review commits, rather than a large diff. They can review changes following a review.

I already review diffs this way, with a local bzr-svn branch using 'bzr

merge; bzr qlog'. Better yet I just sometimes do this on a plane :).

Is that reviewing Svn branches what about text patches? If I address three review comments sending in three patch files seems like a hassle for me and the reviewer and could lead to more delays in the review process.